gnupic@linuxhacker.org

Hi All,
	I have been lurking around this group for awhile. I've noticed
that gpasm supports a large variety of Pic processors...I was wondering
what all of you are using as programmers for these little wonders?? 
This would pertain to the Linux OS.... (Parallel or Serial...)
	I am interested in programming the 16F84, 16C71, 16C711 and the
16F877.
	Thanks for any info!!

--Mike

On Sun, 9 Jan 2000, Scott Dattalo wrote:

> 
> 
> On Sun, 9 Jan 2000, Sam Colwell wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 06 Jan 2000,  James Cameron wrote:
> > > Some day soon I intend to add 16F877 to gpasm if it isn't already there.
> > > I added the 12C509 stuff and it has been working faultlessly for me
> > > since then.
> > 
> > I would definately like to see 16F8xx series added.  I haven't gotten the
> > brandy-newest tarball yet, as I just got back from Christmas vacation, but I
> > plan to do that as soon as I am done reading my backed-up e-mail.  I just got
> > some 16F873/74's from Digikey and I can't wait to try them out.  The 10-bit A/D
> > looks great for some projects here at college.
> 
> Sam,
> 
> http://www.dattalo.com/gnupic/gpasm-0.8.4.tar.gz
> 
> has the following processors:
> 
> gpasm -l
> 
> gen      p12c508  p12c509  p16c54   p16c55   p16c56
> p16c57   p16c58   p16c62   p16c63   p16c64   p16c65
> p16c71   p16c74   p16c83   p16f83   p16c84   p16f84
> p16f877  p18cxx2  p18c242  p18c252  p18c442  p18c452
> sx18     sx20     sx28  
> 
> If someone wants to compile a list of missing processors, I'd be glad to
> add them to gpasm.
> 
> BTW, 0.8.4 has a patch from James Cameron that fixes a core dump if a
> macro contains no assembly instructions.
> 
> Scott
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: gnupic-unsubscribe@linuxhacker.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: gnupic-help@linuxhacker.org
> 
>