gnupic@linuxhacker.org
gnupic@linuxhacker.org
Subject: Re: PIC16F871
From: Byron A Jeff
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 10:39:48 -0400
On Mon, Apr 28, 2003 at 12:52:00PM +0200, Leva wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Finaly, my PIC16F84 programmer works properly. The PIC was faulty.
It happens. Not often though.
>
> I found another IC named PIC16F871. It's cheaper, and has more features. My
> question is. Does the burning protocoll differs to th 'F84?
I'm sure that the bulk erase specification is different. Also the programming
time may be different.
The definitive source is the programming specifications. Microchip has each
and every programming specification online. One of the great things about PICs.
Finally it's always a good idea to ground the LVP/RB3 pin when programming to
prevent a possible low voltage/high voltage glitch when programming.
> I know, that it
> needs only 5V,
You can still program it using the high voltage. It save the abovementioned
LVP pin.
> and has a built in purning program.
Not exactly. The 871 can write its own program memory. So it's possible to load
a bootloader into it. However it's not built in.
> Can I program 871 with a proper hardware by prog84?
prog84 will probably have problems with the bulk erase and the memory size.
If it's a Tait style parallel programmer than maybe David Tait's FPP or Nigel
Goodwin's winpicprg may be a better choice.
BAJ
gnupic@linuxhacker.org