gnupic@linuxhacker.org

gnupic@linuxhacker.org


Subject: Re: Should JAL be added to the gputils?
From: Ralf Forsberg
Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 23:18:04 +0200

On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 02:14:17PM -0400, Byron A Jeff wrote:
> On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 06:30:44AM +0200, Ralf Forsberg wrote:
> > On Sun, May 04, 2003 at 07:47:57PM -0400, Byron A Jeff wrote:
> > > Also I guess that adding some sort of gpsim support would probably be
> > > next on the support list.
> > 
> > Actually, there is already support for SDCC-style HLL line number
> > information. IIRC adding  -rg to the command line will make jal
> > generate line numbers for gpsim. It's not documented anywhere though.
> 
> Cool. But I still haven't heard any opinions on the core ideas. So I'll state 
> it again (espcially for you Ralf as one of the active gputils developers):
> 
> Do you think it's a good idea to look into integraing JAL into the gputils
> suite?

Do you mean packaging it together with gpasm and friends?

I don't actually use JAL myself, so I don't really have an opinion.

For gpsim, adding support for gpasm in JAL could be nice, since I 
think you have to reassemble the asm file with gpasm for it to
work with gpsim. gpsim looks for line numbers only when loading 
a cod file.

Does anyone know how active the development of JAL is? I ask since
when I try to compile any file with the cvs on sourceforge it failes
with:
>  error: operator not known for these operands
>  file 'jpic.jal' line 501 char 60
>  :     var byte a at trisa = ( trisa & 0x0F ) | ( ( d & 0x0F ) << 4 )
>  :  -----------------------------------------------------------^^
It has been like that for a long time. It works with Wouter's version.

BTW, the gnupic page should be updated. It says JAL is not open sourced.

 / Ralf


gnupic@linuxhacker.org