gnupic@linuxhacker.org

gnupic@linuxhacker.org


Subject: Re: Should JAL be added to the gputils?
From: Mark Gross
Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 19:49:12 -0700

I accidently hit the reply too, and ment reply to all.
--mgross

On Monday 05 May 2003 17:32, you wrote:
> On Monday 05 May 2003 14:18, Ralf Forsberg wrote:
> > Does anyone know how active the development of JAL is? I ask since
> > when I try to compile any file with the cvs on sourceforge it failes
>
> Its not as active as it should be, but there seem to only be about 3 folks
> doing more than testing.  I'm going to be hitting it hard starting in June.
> ;)
>
> > with:
> > >  error: operator not known for these operands
> > >  file 'jpic.jal' line 501 char 60
> > >
> > >  :     var byte a at trisa = ( trisa & 0x0F ) | ( ( d & 0x0F ) << 4 )
> > >  :  -----------------------------------------------------------^^
> >
> > It has been like that for a long time. It works with Wouter's version.
>
> I think you have an old set of library files.  This line is now on line 517
> in jpic.jal for the current SF version of JAL.  It looks like your mixing
> lib versions with jal.exe versions.
>
> Also, I can compile a jal program for the 16f877 calling
> port_a_high_direction without issue.  What PIC are you hitting the issue
> on?
>
> > BTW, the gnupic page should be updated. It says JAL is not open sourced.


gnupic@linuxhacker.org