gnupic@linuxhacker.org

Subject: Re: Should JAL be added to the gputils?
From: Ralf Forsberg
Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 17:03:26 +0200

On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 07:49:12PM -0700, Mark Gross wrote:
> On Monday 05 May 2003 17:32, you wrote:
> > On Monday 05 May 2003 14:18, Ralf Forsberg wrote:
> > > Does anyone know how active the development of JAL is? I ask since
> > > when I try to compile any file with the cvs on sourceforge it failes
> >
> > Its not as active as it should be, but there seem to only be about 3 folks
> > doing more than testing.  I'm going to be hitting it hard starting in June.
> > ;)

Sounds good :-). What are you planning to do?

> > > with:
> > > >  error: operator not known for these operands
> > > >  file 'jpic.jal' line 501 char 60
> > > >
> > > >  :     var byte a at trisa = ( trisa & 0x0F ) | ( ( d & 0x0F ) << 4 )
> > > >  :  -----------------------------------------------------------^^
> > >
> > I think you have an old set of library files.  This line is now on line 517
> > in jpic.jal for the current SF version of JAL.  It looks like your mixing
> > lib versions with jal.exe versions.

Yes that was it, sorry, and thanks.

 / Ralf