gnupic@linuxhacker.org

Subject: Re: Should JAL be added to the gputils?
From: Mark Gross
Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 21:00:41 -0700

On Tuesday 06 May 2003 20:44, Scott Dattalo wrote:
> > Whats up with SDCC anyway?  I went to JAL because I couldn't get SDCC /
> > gputils to work last year.
>
> SDCC is a victim. It's been attacked and carried away by aliens (who pay
> money). At the moment, SDCC generates "relocatable" .asm code that can be
> compiled by gpasm and linked with gplink. However, one is still
> constrained to single file projects. The next step for SDCC will be to
> remove some of the register allocation so that the linker can be (better)
> utilized.
>
> ... now if I can ever escape these aliens!

Don't count on it.  They got me by the short hairs too.

--mgross