gnupic@linuxhacker.org

Subject: Re: Should JAL be added to the gputils?
From: Terry Porter
Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 14:30:43 +1000

On Tue, 6 May 2003 20:44:45 -0700 (PDT)
Scott Dattalo <scott@dattalo.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 6 May 2003, Mark Gross wrote:
> 
> > Whats up with SDCC anyway?  I went to JAL because I couldn't get SDCC / 
> > gputils to work last year.
> 
> SDCC is a victim. It's been attacked and carried away by aliens (who pay
> money). At the moment, SDCC generates "relocatable" .asm code that can be
> compiled by gpasm and linked with gplink. However, one is still
> constrained to single file projects. The next step for SDCC will be to
> remove some of the register allocation so that the linker can be (better)
> utilized.
> 
> ... now if I can ever escape these aliens!

Arggh aliens with green backs ;-)

I've a pic of gpsim running sdcc pic code at:-
http://w3w.arafuraconnect.com.au/~tp/embedded.html

--- 
Kind Regards
Terry            
My 2002 motorcycle trip around Oz      
http://w3w.arafuraconnect.com.au/~tp/round-oz.html  
Gnu/Linux/Debian-3.0 Registration Number: 103931 :http//counter.li.org
* Free Software provided by GNU; http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-software-for-freedom.html