gnupic@linuxhacker.org

gnupic@linuxhacker.org


Subject: Re: pic16f628 vs. gpsim
From: Scott Dattalo
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 20:24:48 -0700 (PDT)

On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, Jan Reucker wrote:

> Am Tue, 19 Aug 2003 06:39:08 -0700 (PDT) schrieb Scott Dattalo <scott@dattalo.com>:
> 
> > Yes I did fix this. It looks like that a copy of INTCON was not being 
> > placed at address 0x8B. I didn't test this, so if you could send me your 
> > test code I'll gladly try it out.
> 
> No need for that, I just tested it myself. It seems to work, the tmr0 interrupt
> now really causes an interrupt. Then I simulated a somewhat larger project
> which uses tmr0, PORTB change and RB0 interrupts, everything seemed to work
> fine. This means I can now debug this project without the need to switch to
> Windows, great! Thanks a lot for the fix.

Great! I'll knock this one off the bug list.

> I just stumbled across another thing: the stopwatch seems to calculate
> times for 10 MHz although I specified "frequency 20000000".

Hmm. I'll look at it.

Scott


gnupic@linuxhacker.org