gnupic@linuxhacker.org

Subject: Re: picp
From: Alexandre Pereira Nunes
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 23:43:54 -0300
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Rick Mann wrote:

>>I'm very happy to contribute to it, and even though there's room for
>>improvements on adjacent areas, I'll be satisfied to reach the goal of
>>writing to 18fx52, as we go (currently, I only have 18f252 & 18f452 for
>>testing. Since some of the required data (apparently) wasn't available
>>on the headers sent to the picstart, I had to add those by hand to the
>>device structure).
>>    
>>
>
>Is programming the 18Fxx20 parts the same? Or is that yet another part that
>needs to be coded? I'm currently working on a board with an 18F6520 (I think
>that's the part num).
>
>  
>

Currently, with the changes I've made, supporting  any part not already 
supported requires some coding (filling some variables, actually). I'm 
trying to overcome these limitations as possible but have not yet 
suceeded on that.

I guess it's trivial to set the xx20 parts up,  but that's yet to be 
confirmed. Currently I still have to finish some things up, but right 
after that I'll take a look at that. I'll let you know, then.

- - Alexandre

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/YTLzc/q4llewz9oRApJAAKCxrm7LoYDOchCetXlXVIZDqEKrbgCg3Xa2
m2meobZwbRslHLlyFpbwfUA=
=g2zO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----