gnupic@linuxhacker.org
gnupic@linuxhacker.org
Scott Dattalo wrote:
>On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Alexandre Pereira Nunes wrote:
>
>
>>No, I'm not! picp-0.5d have this behaviour, but the patch undoes that.
>>Did you apply the picp-2003*-Makefile patch? If yes, you're not supposed
>>to do it, that's only for folks not running linux which may try to do a
>>port (because some of my changes to makefile depends on gnu make, which
>>is not available or is not the default make on some BSD systems, for
>>example). I guess I could not manage to get myself clear on the
>>announcement email, sorry :-)
>>
>>
>
>Yes, I applied the Makefile patch too. I should have read the instructions
>more closely.
>
>Scott
>
>
>
For the original patch, you may have to remove -Werror, though, since I
forgot to tune that before releasing the patch. That may or may not give
people trouble, depending on libc/gcc versions and headers. The next
patch will ship without that :-)
I'll not be working on these picp changes for some days, except,
perhaps, for correcting reported bugs.
Cheers,
Alexandre
gnupic@linuxhacker.org