gnupic@linuxhacker.org

gnupic@linuxhacker.org


Subject: Re: regression tests
From: Craig Franklin
Date: 20 Oct 2003 00:04:51 -0500

Oops.  I responded to his message, but the attachment exceeded 30k.

For those that are interested, not all the regression tests pass.  I
compare each test report with a "golden" report before each release.

On Sun, 2003-10-19 at 00:03, Andrew Dalgleish wrote:
> I have made a port for OpenBSD.  The port is at:
> http://www.ajd.net.au/ports/port-gputils-0.11.7.tgz
> 
> I'm getting a handfull of failures in the regression tests, with
> identical results on i386 and sparc64.
> Do all the regression tests in CVS pass with 0.11.7?
> 
> 
> When I get these all sorted out I'll submit some patches against the
> current gputils CVS version. (Minor string handling paranoia, one
> malloc->calloc bug in libgputils/gpmemory.c, and some shell script
> portability issues.)
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Andrew Dalgleish
> http://www.ajd.net.au/
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: gnupic-unsubscribe@linuxhacker.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: gnupic-help@linuxhacker.org
> 


gnupic@linuxhacker.org