gnupic@linuxhacker.org

On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 12:29:48PM +0200, Ralf Forsberg wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 07:59:45PM +1000, James Cameron wrote:
> > load h tmp.hex
> > load c tmp.cod
> nitpic(k), the tmp.cod will load the hex and set the processor. 
> (i.e. the "load h" and processor commands are unnessesary)

Thanks for that.  Is this provided tmp.hex and tmp.cod are from the 
same assembler run?  Or will the second load erase the code memory and
replace it with the new content?  Or does the load of tmp.cod cause 
tmp.hex to be read as well?

-- 
James Cameron    mailto:quozl@us.netrek.org     http://quozl.netrek.org/