plustek@linuxhacker.org

Subject: Re: Code constants
From: Steve McGuire
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2000 00:45:05 GMT
Upon examining 2.4.0-test1's /include/linux/parport.h, it seems that the 
named constants have changed, dropping the PC out of the name. 

Steve


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

On 8/6/00, 12:11:16 PM, g-jaeger@t-online.de (G. Jaeger) wrote regarding 
Re: Code constants:


> On Sat, 05 Aug 2000 06:03:47 GMT, Steve McGuire wrote:

> >When I try to compile the plustek driver, gcc reports that the following
> >named constants are not present:
> >     PARPORT MODE PCECR
> >     PARPORT MODE PCECPEPP
> >     PARPORT MODE PCECPPS2
> >     PARPORT MODE PCPS2
> >     PARPORT MODE PCEPP
> >     PARPORT MODE PCECR
> >When I checked out the source file that used these constants,(misc.c), I
> >saw that they are used as bitmasks. I have grep'ed through the .h and 
the
> >Linux parport code to find these constants, but have had no luck. I am
> >using glibc 2.1, RH6.2 base distribution, with the 2.4.0-test1 kernel
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Steve McGuire
> >smcguire@psu.edu
> >
> Hi Steve,

> AFAIK Kernel 2.4 should contain the parport code and also the needed
> header-files. But to be shure I'm going to get the new sources tomorrow
> at buisness, where I have a faster internet connection...

> Gerhard

> ----------------------------------------
> g.jaeger@earthling.net
> ----------------------------------------