nanogui@linuxhacker.org

nanogui@linuxhacker.org


Subject: Re: Technical Framebuffer proposal for RTEMS graphics
From: Greg Haerr
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2000 11:53:45 -0700

: A small difference is how the access to the driver is made. 
: In your proposal, many ioctls() calls to do different things. 
: 
: The one that I proposed the driver would provide
: a table with the entry points for the services provided
: by the driver.
: 
The addresses returned by the kernel aren't valid for
user mode routines to call directly in RTEMS, right?
They certainly aren't in Linux.  That's why I suggest
ioctl.


Regards,

Greg


nanogui@linuxhacker.org