nanogui@linuxhacker.org

{cross posted to relevent person and the NanoGUI list]

> -----Original Message-----
> I think a more direct C/C++ implementation would be
> a better way to go.  Especially when some of the ports
> are targeting low 2-4MB memory machines.  As much as I
> hate to admit it, Pocket IE rocks on my 2Meg SH3 40MHz.

IIRC, there was a Opera port in progress using MWIN/NanoGUI -- but I
don't know if they plan to cover LinuxCE too.

	-Darran