nanogui@linuxhacker.org

>> I think a more direct C/C++ implementation would be
>> a better way to go.  Especially when some of the ports
>> are targeting low 2-4MB memory machines.  As much as I
>> hate to admit it, Pocket IE rocks on my 2Meg SH3 40MHz.
>
>IIRC, there was a Opera port in progress using MWIN/NanoGUI -- but I
>don't know if they plan to cover LinuxCE too.



If we had a LinuxCE computer around, I can't see why this shouldn't be
possible. Both opera and nano-X are so portable that it would be little
painful to manage this.  Of course, I would have to make sure this first
version get 100% completed first.  I will put a lot of effort in it the next
following weeks, and it will be finished soon. Thanks to Morten, it looks
REALLY nice :)

-Richard