nanogui@linuxhacker.org
nanogui@linuxhacker.org
> this weekend. I had previosly left all this out, since the full blown, X-like
> region code (dynamically allocated) requires more memory than the simple
> version that we're currently running, which uses a static array of rectangles,
> and only one region is allowed. (oh well, having full-blown clipping for any
> use is probably a very good thing, since then Nano-X or Microwindows can
> then be used for any application or widget set, instead of the large X11)
So those functions are only available with the dynamic region support. And
if you build low memory you dont get them - seems fair enough.
>
nanogui@linuxhacker.org