nanogui@linuxhacker.org

Sorry, I misexplained my project. The visualization will be _both_ on the
embedded system on the machine _and_ on the remote control. In this case,
nanoX is attractive because the server is light enaugh for the embedded
system, and also the communication protocol in faster (it will run on
low-speed radio modem or GSM phone).
I'll let you know when I succeed to run something.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin_Doering@mn.man.de [mailto:Martin_Doering@mn.man.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2000 10:31 AM
> To: greg@Censoft.com; parodif@gea-automotive.com;
> nanogui@linuxhacker.org
> Subject: Antwort:Re: client/server nanoX
> 
> 
> Hmmm. I think, there is no network code in it, so it is 
> client/server, but not
> over a network - just local. Why don't you use X11 for that? 
> On the embedded
> system you would just need the XLib, not a whole X11-Server. 
> (I know - X11 is
> rather big   :-(    )
> 
> Another solution would be to run nano-X not on a real 
> display, but on VNC . I
> think the routines for changes on the screen could help to 
> make the graphics
> transfer to the VNC-Viewer more intelligent - not as fast as 
> X11, but better
> than a normal mapped/transferred screen.
> 
> Martin
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: nanogui-unsubscribe@linuxhacker.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: nanogui-help@linuxhacker.org
> 

Sorry, I misexplained my project. The visualization will be both on the embedded system on the machine and on the remote control. In this case, nanoX is attractive because the server is light enaugh for the embedded system, and also the communication protocol in faster (it will run on low-speed radio modem or GSM phone).

I'll let you know when I succeed to run something.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Doering@mn.man.de [mailto:Martin Doering@mn.man.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2000 10:31 AM
> To: greg@Censoft.com; parodif@gea-automotive.com;
> nanogui@linuxhacker.org
> Subject: Antwort:Re: client/server nanoX
>
>
> Hmmm. I think, there is no network code in it, so it is
> client/server, but not
> over a network - just local. Why don't you use X11 for that?
> On the embedded
> system you would just need the XLib, not a whole X11-Server.
> (I know - X11 is
> rather big   :-(    )
>
> Another solution would be to run nano-X not on a real
> display, but on VNC . I
> think the routines for changes on the screen could help to
> make the graphics
> transfer to the VNC-Viewer more intelligent - not as fast as
> X11, but better
> than a normal mapped/transferred screen.
>
> Martin
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: nanogui-unsubscribe@linuxhacker.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: nanogui-help@linuxhacker.org
>