nanogui@linuxhacker.org

nanogui@linuxhacker.org


Subject: RE: Kaffe port to Microwindows
From: Rod Boyce
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 10:04:30 +1200

How about Borland C 3.2, 5.02 and the free turbo C I think version 1.??
something.

I personally work in Borland C 5.02.  But there are other people using the
other older versions.

		-----Original Message-----
		From:	Bradley D. LaRonde [mailto:brad@ltc.com]
		Sent:	Wednesday, 22 March 2000 09:54
		To:	George Harvey; nanogui@linuxhacker.org
		Subject:	Re: Kaffe port to Microwindows

		----- Original Message -----
		From: "George Harvey" <fr30@dial.pipex.com>
		To: <nanogui@linuxhacker.org>
		Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2000 4:30 PM
		Subject: RE: Kaffe port to Microwindows


		> On 21-Mar-00, Jean-Eric Cuendet wrote:
		>
		> >>
		> >> : It would be great to have MWin autoconf/automake, no?
Does
		> >> anyone already
		> >> : started it?
		> >>
		> >> No one has started it yet.  I have been working on
other
		> >> things.  Do you
		> >> think it needs it?  What parameters would it change?
		> >>
		>
		> >It's standard, full portable and easy to do.
		> >I think someone should do it ASAP (before too many people
use it)
		>
		> >Is anyone out there interested in "porting" MWin to
autoconf/automake?
		>
		> Microwindows is targeted at a broad range of platforms,
and not all of
		> them are Un*x derivatives. Does autoconf work with
cross-compilers and
		> non-Un*x hosts?

		Definately with cross compilers - it actually makes it
easier.

		As for other platforms... I don't know.  Did you have some
other platform in
		mind?

		Regards,
		Brad


	
---------------------------------------------------------------------
		To unsubscribe, e-mail: nanogui-unsubscribe@linuxhacker.org
		For additional commands, e-mail:
nanogui-help@linuxhacker.org

nanogui@linuxhacker.org