nanogui@linuxhacker.org
nanogui@linuxhacker.org
How about Borland C 3.2, 5.02 and the free turbo C I think version 1.??
something.
I personally work in Borland C 5.02. But there are other people using the
other older versions.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bradley D. LaRonde [mailto:brad@ltc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 22 March 2000 09:54
To: George Harvey; nanogui@linuxhacker.org
Subject: Re: Kaffe port to Microwindows
----- Original Message -----
From: "George Harvey" <fr30@dial.pipex.com>
To: <nanogui@linuxhacker.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2000 4:30 PM
Subject: RE: Kaffe port to Microwindows
> On 21-Mar-00, Jean-Eric Cuendet wrote:
>
> >>
> >> : It would be great to have MWin autoconf/automake, no?
Does
> >> anyone already
> >> : started it?
> >>
> >> No one has started it yet. I have been working on
other
> >> things. Do you
> >> think it needs it? What parameters would it change?
> >>
>
> >It's standard, full portable and easy to do.
> >I think someone should do it ASAP (before too many people
use it)
>
> >Is anyone out there interested in "porting" MWin to
autoconf/automake?
>
> Microwindows is targeted at a broad range of platforms,
and not all of
> them are Un*x derivatives. Does autoconf work with
cross-compilers and
> non-Un*x hosts?
Definately with cross compilers - it actually makes it
easier.
As for other platforms... I don't know. Did you have some
other platform in
mind?
Regards,
Brad
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: nanogui-unsubscribe@linuxhacker.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
nanogui-help@linuxhacker.org
nanogui@linuxhacker.org