nanogui@linuxhacker.org

> > and most importantly runs on both X and Microwindows (we're
> > using the Nano-X multiple client/server API).  We then wrote
> > a very thin user interface (this needs more work) that allows
> > a user to operate the display engine, essentially.
> 
> 
> Argh. You just tied yourself to code that will have no development
> whatsoever in the future. Why not use KDE2's widget? It's much better.

Well to be fair

1.	The KDE2 widget is (or 2 weeks ago was) buggier than Mozilla at its
	worst

2.	If you look how the port has been done you should be able to drop
	the KDE2 widget into the same Qt wrapper magic without much work
	when its ready

Alan