nanogui@linuxhacker.org
nanogui@linuxhacker.org
On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
> 2. If you look how the port has been done you should be able to drop
> the KDE2 widget into the same Qt wrapper magic without much work
> when its ready
Is there a reason that gtkhtml wasn't used?
Brief pokings around suggest to me that it's a little bit
lighter.
Of course, gtk+ would probably be harder to wrap than Qt.
Matthew.
nanogui@linuxhacker.org