nanogui@linuxhacker.org

nanogui@linuxhacker.org


Subject: Re: Problems building FLTK for Nano-x (fwd)
From: yi yang
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 20:14:54 -0700 (PDT)

Yes, you meet the question.
It is a simple syntax mistake.

If you check the cxx file, you will find
there is a extra "return" that breaked one line.
You can first use grep to find where is it, 
then fix it.

However, I suggest you try a better tarred file.
http://hpc.ee.ntu.edu.tw/~murphy/fltk-1.0.9-nanox-pre2.tar.gz
See the attachment.


--- Alex Holden <alex@linuxhacker.org> wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 12:29:07 -0500
> From: S A McConnell <samcconn@cotw.com>
> To: nanoqui@linuxhacker.org
> Subject: Problems building FLTK for Nano-x
> 
> Any thoughts about what I am doing wrong?
> 
> If I provide updates to README files will they be
> excepted?
> 
> Scott
>
> fl_scroll_area.cxx
> fl_scroll_area.cxx: In function `void fl_scroll(int,
> int, int, int, int,
> int, void (*)(void *, int, int, int, int), void *)':
> fl_scroll_area.cxx:89: implicit declaration of
> function `int
> printf(...)'


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/

nanogui@linuxhacker.org