nanogui@linuxhacker.org
nanogui@linuxhacker.org
> I developing an embedded program using fltk under X11 at the moment,
> the goal is to have it running under microwindows. I have compiled
> the program using the flnx-0.10 and the latest nano-X (got it from CVS).
>
> The programm running really slow compare to the X11 version.
> I also compiled it with fltk-mwin32-pre5, it feels a little bit faster
> but
> it's more buggy. I want my fltk program to behave exactly the same as it
> does on X11,
> keyboard events etc.. My question is which path should I take, fltk for
> nano-X
> or mwin32? I am happy to help for making it better.
We are currently working hard adding support for Microwindows
to the fltk for Nano-X, known as FLNX. I would suggest that
you work with this version, rather than the win32 version, as flnx
supports multiple processes.
Please send bug reports to this list, I need to understand more
as to exactly what is slow, etc. Is it the drawing code, keyboard?
You might also subscribe to the viewml-devel list at www.viewml.com,
since most of the activity has been concerned with getting up the
ViewML port using FLNX.
Regards,
Greg
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> ---------------------------
> Embedded System Developer
>
> Karl Janmar
> Svensk ByggnadsGeodesi AB
> Kvarnbergsvägen 27
> 141 45 HUDDINGE
> SWEDEN
>
> Phone: +46 (0)8 7112090
> Fax: +46 (0)8 7112098
> Homepage: http://www.sbg.se
> E-mail: karl@sbg.se
> ---------------------------
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: nanogui-unsubscribe@linuxhacker.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: nanogui-help@linuxhacker.org
>
>
nanogui@linuxhacker.org