nanogui@linuxhacker.org
nanogui@linuxhacker.org
Anyone got statistics on the speed front?
> Some statistics on the memory front...
....
> > Basically, the 18M version of Mozilla on Nano-X takes 48M
> > on X?? Is that right?
>
> :Actually mozilla+X compared to mozilla+NanoX. The big benefit is due to
> : not needing X. Although the NanoX build is 4Meg smaller than the X version
>
> This is great news. I'm extremely pleased to hear that Nano-X has
> come to the point that it can run such a sophisticated application...
>
Rob Taylor
Flying Pig System
nanogui@linuxhacker.org