[<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
nano-x porting and GUI libraries
From: LM ####@####.#### Date: 6 Mar 2013 12:33:35 -0000 Message-Id: <CAFipMOGj_KCknA=4H-40cXDUUhzxkY9bmeO5fJzb_W9hF7+P_g@mail.gmail.com> Had some general questions about libraries that work with nano-x/microwindows and about what systems it might potentially run on. Has anyone been able to get nano-x nxlib building and working natively on Windows? I was able to get it to build in Cygwin using their X11 support. However, would love to be able to run some X applications natively on Windows without the need for Cygwin. Is anyone else interested in this besides me? I've also been hearing a lot of talk about Wayland on Linux systems. Has there been any thought of porting nano-x/microwindows to run on top of Wayland? I read that Wayland was going to be able to run X11 applications through an X server running as a client. I've also been trying to check which GUI libraries would run well on nano-x. FLTK 1.3 looks good. I tried to check if SDL 1.2.15 worked as well. Asked on the SDL mailing list, but no one seemed to know. I did notice some code in the SDL library that looked like it targeted nano-x, but wasn't sure if it was up-to-date and working. If SDL is working, pdcurses has an option to run via SDL, so that should work as well. Any other GUI libraries worth checking out for use with nano-x? Has anyone had any luck with wxwidgets and nano-x? There is a wxwidgets embedded port to X11 that cuts out the need for GTK+, but this doesn't appear to be fully implemented and functioning. Couldn't help wondering if the Windows version of wxwidgets might work with microwindows and allow porting of some programs like audacity and filezilla. Any other ideas? Any suggestions of what Open Source applications might port easily/work with nano-x? Thanks. Sincerely, Laura http://www.distasis.com/cpp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: [nanogui] nano-x porting and GUI libraries
From: "Georg Potthast" ####@####.#### Date: 6 Mar 2013 17:03:34 -0000 Message-Id: <CF654074A35448A49A852D0C3AE65F5C@SCHREIBTISCHGP> Hi Laura, as you know I worked on a MinGW version of Nano-X based on the Allegro graphics library. I had to stop in the middle and work on other projects though. So far I could not continue yet. I doubt if there is any need for Nano-X on MinGW. MinGW can provide XWindows support already so I think using a limited XWindows like Nano-X instead of XWindows is of little value here. Most programmers will have to use a GUI which is based on XWindows like FLTK anyway and that has been ported to Windows already without Nano-X/NXlib. Nano-X is an alternative to XWindows to be used with embedded systems. It only needs a frame buffer on Linux systems. Running Nano-X on Wayland would add a code base without making Nano-X any different for the user. As with SDL I have made no tests yet. It says on the Microwindows website that SDL 1.2.4a will run with Nano-X and provides a link to download that version of SDL. Whether the current version of SDL will run on Nano-X/NXlib instead of XWindows remains to be tested I guess. Probably NXlib would have to be extended for that. Also the audio part of SDL cannot be handled by Nano-X. Georg | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>] |