nanogui: Licensing
Subject:
Re[2]: Licensing
From:
Alexander Peuchert ####@####.####
Date:
11 May 1999 09:03:13 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.GSO.4.02.9905111100430.24754-100000@rumburak>
On Tue, 11 May 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> : Greg and I have been talking about the licensing of Nano-X, and we've
> : decided to open it to the list for discussion.
>
> Personally, I like the FreeBSD model license the best. It is the
> traditional BSD licensing, with the advertising/documentation clause
> removed. It gives the software the most freedom to be used in any
> application. It has been successful in FreeBSD where most companies
> that are using FreeBSD for their embedded machines have contributed
> back fixes for the main-line FreeBSD. Whistle, Jupiter, and Pluto
> Technologies all make on going improvements to FreeBSD (I work for
> Pluto, so am biased).
As long as feedback for the sources is garanteed, the licensing model
doesn't matter, in my oppinion.
>
> Warner
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
>
- alex
Alexander Peuchert
####@####.####
http://www.peuchert.de ( not very interesting yet ;-) )
