nanogui: VNC Server for Nanox


Previous by date: 3 Feb 2006 11:16:49 +0000 Re: linking nano-x problem, Marshia R.
Next by date: 3 Feb 2006 11:16:49 +0000 Re: Images not drawn (FLTK+nxlib app with nano-X), Martin Kajdas
Previous in thread: 3 Feb 2006 11:16:49 +0000 Re: VNC Server for Nanox, yan seiner
Next in thread: 3 Feb 2006 11:16:49 +0000 Re: VNC Server for Nanox, Dave Stuart

Subject: Re: [nanogui] VNC Server for Nanox
From: Manav Kataria ####@####.####
Date: 3 Feb 2006 11:16:49 +0000
Message-Id: <43E33B56.10307@isofttech.com>

Hi Yan,
> If you're a framebuffer hacker I am told it is not difficult to 
> implement a full virtual framebuffer in the kernel... But I looked at 
> the code and it was not at all obvious to me what was going on.  
> Briefly, you have to allocate some real memory, and then set up the 
> frambuffer functions accordingly.  We ended up not using nano-X, so I 
> dropped the whole thing.
If you're able to bypass the NanoX Engine and still write to the 
framebuffer - Wouldn't that increase your performance ?

Regards,
Manav

yan seiner wrote:
> Pete Klemm wrote:
>
>> I now have a TightVNC Client on my PC with the nano-X remote
>> frame buffer and I can click the mouse in that window and see that
>> the mouse event is recognized on the remote system, but I just get
>> a black box in the TightVNC window.
>>
>> Any thoughts and/or suggestions?
>
> Oh, well, yes...
>
> AFAICT, VNC needs either X running to provide a virtual framebuffer, 
> or a physical framebuffer....
>
> I tried using the kernel virtual framebuffer, but basically it is just 
> a graphical bitbucket.
>
> If you're a framebuffer hacker I am told it is not difficult to 
> implement a full virtual framebuffer in the kernel... But I looked at 
> the code and it was not at all obvious to me what was going on.  
> Briefly, you have to allocate some real memory, and then set up the 
> frambuffer functions accordingly.  We ended up not using nano-X, so I 
> dropped the whole thing.
>
>>
>> Also, is it possible to make the 320x240 window display larger
>> using the scaling? I tried 2 to 1 but the window stayed the same
>> size and 1 to 2 made it half the size.
>
> Not sure what you mean.  I don't think VNC allows you to zoom; I could 
> be wrong....
>
> --Yan
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
>

Previous by date: 3 Feb 2006 11:16:49 +0000 Re: linking nano-x problem, Marshia R.
Next by date: 3 Feb 2006 11:16:49 +0000 Re: Images not drawn (FLTK+nxlib app with nano-X), Martin Kajdas
Previous in thread: 3 Feb 2006 11:16:49 +0000 Re: VNC Server for Nanox, yan seiner
Next in thread: 3 Feb 2006 11:16:49 +0000 Re: VNC Server for Nanox, Dave Stuart


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.