nanogui: benchmark for nano-X ?


Previous by date: 30 Jul 2007 18:30:31 +0100 Re: What's the latest/recommended version of nano-X?, nanogui.reliableembeddedsystems.com
Next by date: 30 Jul 2007 18:30:31 +0100 Re: Resize Built-in Fonts, Greg Haerr
Previous in thread: 30 Jul 2007 18:30:31 +0100 benchmark for nano-X ?, Steven Scholz
Next in thread:

Subject: Re: benchmark for nano-X ?
From: "Aaron J. Grier" ####@####.####
Date: 30 Jul 2007 18:30:31 +0100
Message-Id: <20070730173026.GL22036@mordor.unix.fryenet>

On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 01:42:05PM +0200, Steven Scholz wrote:
> I am trying to find out the performance impact for serveral config
> options like LINK_APP_INTO_SERVER, HAVE_SHAREDMEM_SUPPORT, HAVE_FILEIO
> etc. using the X11 API and FLTK.
> 
> And maybe even compare nano-X vs. Xorg server.
> 
> Is there a simple benchmark programm out there?

x11perf ?

-- 
  Aaron J. Grier  |   Frye Electronics, Tigard, OR   |  ####@####.####

Previous by date: 30 Jul 2007 18:30:31 +0100 Re: What's the latest/recommended version of nano-X?, nanogui.reliableembeddedsystems.com
Next by date: 30 Jul 2007 18:30:31 +0100 Re: Resize Built-in Fonts, Greg Haerr
Previous in thread: 30 Jul 2007 18:30:31 +0100 benchmark for nano-X ?, Steven Scholz
Next in thread:


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.