nanogui: Re: [nanogui] Is Nano-X dead? - Move to SVN+Trac?
Subject:
Re: [nanogui] Re: Is Nano-X dead? - Move to SVN+Trac?
From:
Junior ####@####.####
Date:
9 Jul 2008 13:52:17 -0000
Message-Id: <F9F09819888.00000128ejr@inbox.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ####@####.####
> Sent: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 15:57:38 -0700
> To: ####@####.#### ####@####.####
> Subject: Re: [nanogui] Re: Is Nano-X dead? - Move to SVN+Trac?
>
> provided that there's some way to import from CVS, I don't imagine the
> : choice of SCCS being terribly important, but I would hate to start from
> : ground zero in my continual merge process.
>
> Do you mean import TO CVS? I know git for instance
> allows importing from CVS projects, but I'm not sure about
> its ability to export to CVS... something to consider for sure.
>
> : I'm having to do enough hand work as is.
>
> My last perusal of systems like git (and hopefully bazaar)
> have mechanisms that allow for much smoother importation
> of fixes and submissions. Linus swears by how much time
> git saves him; there's also ways to import directly from an
> email, for instance.
I've heard good things about git but haven't really understand it all. I've only used it to pull and update sources, everything else I still do by patches. I think it would be a good idea to move to a better system but I just never had the time to fully implement one. I would think git is a better candidate because of its wide usage but I would say move to one that would make contribution easier and less work.
Jr.
____________________________________________________________
GET FREE 5GB EMAIL - Check out spam free email with many cool features!
Visit http://www.inbox.com/email to find out more!
