nanogui: Licensing


Previous by date: 12 May 1999 11:05:24 -0000 Re: nanoX name and licensing..., Alan Cox
Next by date: 12 May 1999 11:05:24 -0000 Re: NanoX version 0.3 released, Alan Cox
Previous in thread: 12 May 1999 11:05:24 -0000 Re: Licensing, Greg Haerr
Next in thread: 12 May 1999 11:05:24 -0000 Re: Licensing, Greg Haerr

Subject: Re: Re[2]: Licensing
From: Alan Cox ####@####.####
Date: 12 May 1999 11:05:24 -0000
Message-Id: <E10hXZC-0008V8-00@the-village.bc.nu>

> files containing mini-X code as they are (possibly rewriting them over
> time and changing the license when none of the original is left), and put
> new code in seperate files under whatever license you want. That shouldn't
> be a problem from the GPL perspective, as it allows linking with code
> under a less restrictive license.

You can put the new code in the same files if you want so long as you 
can separate stuff out. I did actually read the licenses before doing
the initial proof of concept. I've also tried to contact the original
author just to say thanks but had no success

Alan


Previous by date: 12 May 1999 11:05:24 -0000 Re: nanoX name and licensing..., Alan Cox
Next by date: 12 May 1999 11:05:24 -0000 Re: NanoX version 0.3 released, Alan Cox
Previous in thread: 12 May 1999 11:05:24 -0000 Re: Licensing, Greg Haerr
Next in thread: 12 May 1999 11:05:24 -0000 Re: Licensing, Greg Haerr


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.