nanogui: Named Socket Binding and romfs
Subject:
Re: [nanogui] Named Socket Binding and romfs
From:
Alan Cox ####@####.####
Date:
8 May 2002 19:41:27 -0000
Message-Id: <E175XT5-0002FY-00@the-village.bc.nu>
> > I'm amazed you can do much useful without a writable
> > filesystem of some sort.
>
> Why? I guess it depends what useful means...
> I have a shell, and can do many other things without a writable filesystem.
> So far nano-X is the only program that is causing me problems.
Ramfs is tiny and from 2.4.18pre8 onwards included by default in all
kernels (its used to provide a rootfs that exists at all times, removing
all the special case code for 'is there a file system yet' and actually
saving a lot of code ugliness and complexity)
