nanogui: Status?


Previous by date: 6 Sep 1999 13:38:00 -0000 Re: Status?, Vidar Hokstad
Next by date: 6 Sep 1999 13:38:00 -0000 Re: Status?, Vidar Hokstad
Previous in thread: 6 Sep 1999 13:38:00 -0000 Re: Status?, Vidar Hokstad
Next in thread: 6 Sep 1999 13:38:00 -0000 Re: Status?, Vidar Hokstad

Subject: Re: Status?
From: Alan Cox ####@####.####
Date: 6 Sep 1999 13:38:00 -0000
Message-Id: <E11Nypt-0008Qv-00@the-village.bc.nu>

> I've also started seeing a few shortcomings that needs to be dealt with,
> especially with regard to palette handling, and of course server side
> pixmaps etc.

The code that nanogui is based on was for an EGA system, which kind of limited
the colour issue. It does need proper colour stuff adding. Nobody is doing
it right now. Similarly for size reasons server side pixmaps werent in
the original (and it would be good to keep them optional)

> Btw., we're finally hiring more developers, and I'll allocate at least one
> of them to work on Nano-X, and also to port the open sourced flash player.
> We're also sharing the cost for a developer to port a web browser to
> Nano-X with another company. 

Mozilla is almost ready to be hackable to Nanogui. The Mozilla drawn widgets
(eg the Xlib mode) are about to get turned on properly. At that point you
don't even need a toolkit as such to get Mozilla up


Previous by date: 6 Sep 1999 13:38:00 -0000 Re: Status?, Vidar Hokstad
Next by date: 6 Sep 1999 13:38:00 -0000 Re: Status?, Vidar Hokstad
Previous in thread: 6 Sep 1999 13:38:00 -0000 Re: Status?, Vidar Hokstad
Next in thread: 6 Sep 1999 13:38:00 -0000 Re: Status?, Vidar Hokstad


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.