nanogui: Status?
Subject:
RE: Status?
From:
Alex Holden ####@####.####
Date:
7 Sep 1999 19:55:21 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.04.9909072048490.16279-100000@www.linuxhacker.org>
On Tue, 7 Sep 1999, Vidar Hokstad wrote:
> I've taken a look at that, and I'm debating whether I should try to
> complete it, or write something along the same line (I have some ideas
> that should be about as flexible, but save quite a few function calls,
> as well as use less memory).
Can you post more details?
> Have you two discussed any merging of the trees?
Yes, I was going to merge Greg's changes into the CVS tree, but I only got
part way before work got on top of me again. I would have preferred to
have done it incrementally (lots of small understandable patches instead
of "Here's my code. It has so many changes in it since I last sent you
a patch that you may as well throw away your own tree and use mine
instead"), but I still think it's worth merging greg's tree into mine
(with the new build system, and the seperate Bogl library) rather than the
other way around.
--------------- Linux- the choice of a GNU generation. --------------
: Alex Holden (M1CJD)- Caver, Programmer, Land Rover nut, Radio Ham :
-------------------- http://www.linuxhacker.org/ --------------------
