nanogui: Touchscreen response in 0.90 seems slower than 0.89pre11


Previous by date: 22 Jul 2004 06:31:15 +0100 Re: fonts HowTo for microwindows?, Greg Haerr
Next by date: 22 Jul 2004 06:31:15 +0100 Re: Where to get X11 headers ?, Greg Haerr
Previous in thread: 22 Jul 2004 06:31:15 +0100 Touchscreen response in 0.90 seems slower than 0.89pre11, Pete Klemm
Next in thread: 22 Jul 2004 06:31:15 +0100 Re: Touchscreen response in 0.90 seems slower than 0.89pre11, Pete Klemm

Subject: Re: [nanogui] Touchscreen response in 0.90 seems slower than 0.89pre11
From: "Greg Haerr" ####@####.####
Date: 22 Jul 2004 06:31:15 +0100
Message-Id: <068101c46fad$0df80580$3aba46a6@xmission.com>

: I recently updated from 0.89pre11 to the 0.90 release on the web page. 
: Everything
: went smoothly except that I notice a significant increase in time 
: required to detect
: a key press on the touchscreen.
: 
: Is there a parameter that controls the detect time of key presses? Or is 
: 0.90 that much slower?

We moved to a "standard" mouse/touchscreen driver in v0.90.
The couple of changes that might affect you are 1) using the
nxcal calibration routine, which builds a table for determine
touch responses, as well as a Z- value that is used to determine
how hard the touchscreen is pressed.  This value might want to be
decreased for your system.

Regards,

Greg


Previous by date: 22 Jul 2004 06:31:15 +0100 Re: fonts HowTo for microwindows?, Greg Haerr
Next by date: 22 Jul 2004 06:31:15 +0100 Re: Where to get X11 headers ?, Greg Haerr
Previous in thread: 22 Jul 2004 06:31:15 +0100 Touchscreen response in 0.90 seems slower than 0.89pre11, Pete Klemm
Next in thread: 22 Jul 2004 06:31:15 +0100 Re: Touchscreen response in 0.90 seems slower than 0.89pre11, Pete Klemm


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.