nanogui: Licensing summary
Subject:
Re: Licensing summary
From:
Alan Cox ####@####.####
Date:
5 Oct 1999 14:46:35 -0000
Message-Id: <E11YVhl-0000h2-00@the-village.bc.nu>
> I disagree. If a vendor can take the proprietary route, he probably will.
That doesnt back up experience. The only vendor who wants to take a proprietary
route is one for whom this is 'core technology'. To everyone else its overhead
and overheads want reducing so you make more profit on the product.
> BTW, the MPL has a serious flaw in that you can avoid contributing stuff
> back to the project just by putting it in a separate file.
Same with the LGPL, you just put it inside or outside the library.
>
