nanogui: Re: [linuxce-devel] Re: Microwindows plans


Previous by date: 12 Oct 1999 23:43:40 -0000 Re: [linuxce-devel] Re: Microwindows plans, Ben Pfaff
Next by date: 12 Oct 1999 23:43:40 -0000 Re: [linuxce-devel] Re: Microwindows plans, Vidar Hokstad
Previous in thread: 12 Oct 1999 23:43:40 -0000 Re: [linuxce-devel] Re: Microwindows plans, Ben Pfaff
Next in thread: 12 Oct 1999 23:43:40 -0000 Re: [linuxce-devel] Re: Microwindows plans, Vidar Hokstad

Subject: Re: [linuxce-devel] Re: Microwindows plans
From: "Bradley D. LaRonde" ####@####.####
Date: 12 Oct 1999 23:43:40 -0000
Message-Id: <005c01bf150a$969d9830$b8119526@ltc.com>

----- Original Message -----
From: Alex Holden ####@####.####
To: Ben Pfaff ####@####.####
Cc: ####@####.####
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 1999 4:06 PM
Subject: Re: [linuxce-devel] Re: Microwindows plans


> On 11 Oct 1999, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > As I stated before, I'm willing to relicense BOGL.  Is MPL with
> > convert-to-GPL the license that NanoGUI is definitely under now?  If
>
> Yes.

Does that mean that we can freely mix in GPL-only code into the project, or
do we need dual for that?

Regards,
Brad


Previous by date: 12 Oct 1999 23:43:40 -0000 Re: [linuxce-devel] Re: Microwindows plans, Ben Pfaff
Next by date: 12 Oct 1999 23:43:40 -0000 Re: [linuxce-devel] Re: Microwindows plans, Vidar Hokstad
Previous in thread: 12 Oct 1999 23:43:40 -0000 Re: [linuxce-devel] Re: Microwindows plans, Ben Pfaff
Next in thread: 12 Oct 1999 23:43:40 -0000 Re: [linuxce-devel] Re: Microwindows plans, Vidar Hokstad


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.