nanogui: Thread: nanoterm

Subject: nanoterm
From: Alexander Peuchert ####@####.####
Date: 5 May 1999 09:01:01 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.GSO.4.02.9905051058540.22184-100000@rumburak>

Hey

is the client interface finished yet, I could try to port a small terminal
from w to nano-X ...

alex

Alexander Peuchert
####@####.####
http://www.peuchert.de ( not very interesting yet ;-) )

Subject: Re: nanoterm
From: Alex Holden ####@####.####
Date: 5 May 1999 14:10:51 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.04.9905051500000.375-100000@hyperspace>

On Wed, 5 May 1999, Alexander Peuchert wrote:
> is the client interface finished yet, I could try to port a small terminal
> from w to nano-X ...

Um, sort of. The names of the functions might be altered to more closely
match X soon, but we could always just go through and fix the terminal
program when we do that. I think it's probably close enough to be worth
giving it a try once Greg's fixes are in the tree.

--------------- Linux- the choice of a GNU generation. --------------
: Alex Holden (M1CJD)- Caver, Programmer, Land Rover nut, Radio Ham :
-------------------- http://www.linuxhacker.org/ --------------------

Subject: Re: nanoterm
From: Alexander Peuchert ####@####.####
Date: 5 May 1999 14:21:53 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.GSO.4.02.9905051612470.24296-100000@rumburak>

Hi,

how urgent is a app like that??? ( don't have much time: final diploma
report in two weeks )

alex

On Wed, 5 May 1999, Alex Holden wrote:

> On Wed, 5 May 1999, Alexander Peuchert wrote:
> > is the client interface finished yet, I could try to port a small terminal
> > from w to nano-X ...
> 
> Um, sort of. The names of the functions might be altered to more closely
> match X soon, but we could always just go through and fix the terminal
> program when we do that. I think it's probably close enough to be worth
> giving it a try once Greg's fixes are in the tree.
> 
> --------------- Linux- the choice of a GNU generation. --------------
> : Alex Holden (M1CJD)- Caver, Programmer, Land Rover nut, Radio Ham :
> -------------------- http://www.linuxhacker.org/ --------------------
> 
> 
> 

Alexander Peuchert
####@####.####
http://www.peuchert.de ( not very interesting yet ;-) )

Subject: Re: nanoterm
From: Alex Holden ####@####.####
Date: 5 May 1999 17:12:22 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.04.9905051805330.375-100000@hyperspace>

On Wed, 5 May 1999, Alexander Peuchert wrote:
> how urgent is a app like that??? ( don't have much time: final diploma
> report in two weeks )

Not at all. Do your work instead (I'm trying to ;).

--------------- Linux- the choice of a GNU generation. --------------
: Alex Holden (M1CJD)- Caver, Programmer, Land Rover nut, Radio Ham :
-------------------- http://www.linuxhacker.org/ --------------------

Subject: RE: nanoterm
From: Greg Haerr ####@####.####
Date: 5 May 1999 18:53:09 -0000
Message-Id: <01BE96F6.4B946450.greg@censoft.com>

It would be great to add more samples to the example/ directory in nanogui.  In
fact, the more folks testing the api, the better.

Greg

On Wednesday, May 05, 1999 3:00 AM, Alexander Peuchert ####@####.#### wrote:
> Hey
> 
> is the client interface finished yet, I could try to port a small terminal
> from w to nano-X ...
> 
> alex
> 
> Alexander Peuchert
> ####@####.####
> http://www.peuchert.de ( not very interesting yet ;-) )
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
>