| [<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Subject:
Which Freetype2 version to prefer?
From: Daniel ####@####.#### Date: 29 Apr 2010 09:13:49 -0000 Message-Id: <u2vd08fc9ca1004290213vc4b312d1qc86605c1bace3a3a@mail.gmail.com> It's pretty unclear which FT2 version works best with Nano-X. 2.3.5 seems tested, but which version has cache support? I guess caching makes big differences? Regards Daniel | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Subject:
Re: [nanogui] Which Freetype2 version to prefer?
From: "Greg Haerr" ####@####.#### Date: 29 Apr 2010 14:23:07 -0000 Message-Id: <047d01cae7a7$78b939c0$6564a8c0@winXP> : It's pretty unclear which FT2 version works best with Nano-X. 2.3.5 : seems tested, but which version has cache support? I guess caching : makes big differences? I have tested and working v2.3.9, but I don't think there's many differences with 2.3.5. Make sure you're running the git code, as there's been quite a few mods made with Freetype in the last few months. Caching makes a big difference, and finally is working well with FT2. Regards, Greg | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| [<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||