gnupic: gpasm-0.18.1


Previous by date: 28 Feb 2000 05:07:01 -0000 Re: New processor in gpsim, Matthew Bowles
Next by date: 28 Feb 2000 05:07:01 -0000 Re: gpasm-0.18.1, Matthew Bowles
Previous in thread: 28 Feb 2000 05:07:01 -0000 Re: gpasm-0.18.1, Matthew Bowles
Next in thread: 28 Feb 2000 05:07:01 -0000 Re: gpasm-0.18.1, Matthew Bowles

Subject: Re: gpasm-0.18.1
From: Scott Dattalo ####@####.####
Date: 28 Feb 2000 05:07:01 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.05.10002272240040.5169-100000@tempest.blackhat.net>


On Mon, 28 Feb 2000, Matthew Bowles wrote:

> 
> > 
> > b) The 16C8xx devices (and in particularly the 16c877) are now supported.
> > This is an over statement somewhat, because all I've done is allowed the
> > instantiation of the devices, but have not provided the unique features
> > they offer (the 10-bit A/D , flash , and extended ram sizes are not
> > supported)
> > 
> 
> Scott,
> 	up until now, whenever you said 16C877 I just assumed there was a
> different product I hadn't heard of, but now i am convinced that all the
> time you were meaning the 16F877. You threw me for a while.. so
> basically, there's no 16c877. but thanks for adding features for the
> 16F877, or at least up and coming features.

oops. At least it's an F877 in gpsim.

I just added EEPROM support to the 16F874/16F877. It's in CVS, but I
didn't make a tarball...

I'll be adding the program memory flash read/write next.

Ralf - Are you up to writing a program memory object viewer? I was
thinking of something based on gtksheet again, just program memory would
be displayed instead of register memory. 

Modifying program memory is going to have impact on the other windows.
Perhaps we should add xrefs to he object browser and source browser that
get invoked when program memory is changed. In the object browser, we
could update the window to reflect the new changes - perhaps highlighting
the modified locations with a unique color. For the source browser, I'm
not sure what we should do...

Does anyone have any suggestions on how 1) to present the contents of
program memory 2) to convey changes in the program memory?


Scott


Previous by date: 28 Feb 2000 05:07:01 -0000 Re: New processor in gpsim, Matthew Bowles
Next by date: 28 Feb 2000 05:07:01 -0000 Re: gpasm-0.18.1, Matthew Bowles
Previous in thread: 28 Feb 2000 05:07:01 -0000 Re: gpasm-0.18.1, Matthew Bowles
Next in thread: 28 Feb 2000 05:07:01 -0000 Re: gpasm-0.18.1, Matthew Bowles


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.