nanogui: IPC client/server comm.


Previous by date: 30 Mar 2000 13:12:53 -0000 Re: Unicode, Morten Rolland
Next by date: 30 Mar 2000 13:12:53 -0000 Re: client/server protocol speedup, vidar.hokstad.com
Previous in thread: 30 Mar 2000 13:12:53 -0000 Re: IPC client/server comm., Greg Haerr
Next in thread: 30 Mar 2000 13:12:53 -0000 Re: IPC client/server comm., vidar.hokstad.com

Subject: RE: IPC client/server comm.
From: "Rob Taylor" ####@####.####
Date: 30 Mar 2000 13:12:53 -0000
Message-Id: <000501bf9a48$4c160ea0$b400a8c0@eventhorizon>

> : Do you think integrating that communication mechanism in nanox would be
> : difficult/long/annoying ? (I know that Morten already contributed shared
> :
> : mem support)
>
> I'm also interested in another option: direct client framebuffer
> mapping.  This
> would allow the client process to write the framebuffer directly.
>  It would have
> access to shared code and data that would setup the appropriate clip
> regions so that window heirarchies would be maintained...

that would be extra cool ;)
Along these lines, I was just looking at the clipping code just now, and
just wanted to ask if I was right in thinking that currently the current
clipping area is stored in a global static, which is manipulated in the
device level code?

Thanks,
Rob


Previous by date: 30 Mar 2000 13:12:53 -0000 Re: Unicode, Morten Rolland
Next by date: 30 Mar 2000 13:12:53 -0000 Re: client/server protocol speedup, vidar.hokstad.com
Previous in thread: 30 Mar 2000 13:12:53 -0000 Re: IPC client/server comm., Greg Haerr
Next in thread: 30 Mar 2000 13:12:53 -0000 Re: IPC client/server comm., vidar.hokstad.com


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.