nanogui: Cleaning up the source trees


Previous by date: 29 Sep 1999 18:23:49 -0000 Re: Cleaning up the source trees, Ben Pfaff
Next by date: 29 Sep 1999 18:23:49 -0000 Re: Cleaning up the source trees, Ben Pfaff
Previous in thread: 29 Sep 1999 18:23:49 -0000 Re: Cleaning up the source trees, Ben Pfaff
Next in thread: 29 Sep 1999 18:23:49 -0000 Re: Cleaning up the source trees, Ben Pfaff

Subject: Re: Cleaning up the source trees
From: Alex Holden ####@####.####
Date: 29 Sep 1999 18:23:49 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.04.9909291905140.387-100000@hyperspace>

On Wed, 29 Sep 1999, Bradley D. LaRonde wrote:
> Hrm... GGI... do I need that?  I forget now what it is even. :-)

GGI could potentially be used instead of Bogl. It would let you do things
like develop Nano-X on top of full X, and later shift the same binary onto
a framebuffer based system. It's still a little big, slow, and unstable
(or at least was when I last looked about 3 months ago), but it is an
ambitious project and could potentially be a very useful library in the
future... It's sister library, GII, has some nice features (the mouse
drivers, in particular, are much more cleanly written than GPM).

--------------- Linux- the choice of a GNU generation. --------------
: Alex Holden (M1CJD)- Caver, Programmer, Land Rover nut, Radio Ham :
-------------------- http://www.linuxhacker.org/ --------------------



Previous by date: 29 Sep 1999 18:23:49 -0000 Re: Cleaning up the source trees, Ben Pfaff
Next by date: 29 Sep 1999 18:23:49 -0000 Re: Cleaning up the source trees, Ben Pfaff
Previous in thread: 29 Sep 1999 18:23:49 -0000 Re: Cleaning up the source trees, Ben Pfaff
Next in thread: 29 Sep 1999 18:23:49 -0000 Re: Cleaning up the source trees, Ben Pfaff


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.