gnupic: gpasm bugs
Subject:
Re: gpasm bugs
From:
"Eric Smith" ####@####.####
Date:
25 Mar 2002 21:37:27 -0000
Message-Id: <33237.64.169.63.74.1017091855.squirrel@ruckus.brouhaha.com>
> The assembler treats the second operand of the instruction as a number.
> So as far as it's concerned whatever value RamLocation2 represents is
> the number for the second operand. Also that operand is a single bit,
> so the assember only uses the least significant bit.
There's no reason why the assembler shouldn't consider it an error
if the W/F operand has a value other than 0 or 1. This would catch
the vast majority of cases where the user tried to use the wrong
kind of operand.
