gnupic: gpasm


Previous by date: 9 Jan 2000 19:13:49 -0000 Re: watch window for gpsim gui, Scott Dattalo
Next by date: 9 Jan 2000 19:13:49 -0000 Re: gpsim development, Anthony Tekatch
Previous in thread: 9 Jan 2000 19:13:49 -0000 Re: gpasm, Sam Colwell
Next in thread: 9 Jan 2000 19:13:49 -0000 Re: gpasm, Michael W. Bogucki

Subject: Re: gpasm
From: Scott Dattalo ####@####.####
Date: 9 Jan 2000 19:13:49 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.05.10001091256480.28744-100000@tempest.blackhat.net>


On Sun, 9 Jan 2000, Sam Colwell wrote:

> On Thu, 06 Jan 2000,  James Cameron wrote:
> > Some day soon I intend to add 16F877 to gpasm if it isn't already there.
> > I added the 12C509 stuff and it has been working faultlessly for me
> > since then.
> 
> I would definately like to see 16F8xx series added.  I haven't gotten the
> brandy-newest tarball yet, as I just got back from Christmas vacation, but I
> plan to do that as soon as I am done reading my backed-up e-mail.  I just got
> some 16F873/74's from Digikey and I can't wait to try them out.  The 10-bit A/D
> looks great for some projects here at college.

Sam,

http://www.dattalo.com/gnupic/gpasm-0.8.4.tar.gz

has the following processors:

gpasm -l

gen      p12c508  p12c509  p16c54   p16c55   p16c56
p16c57   p16c58   p16c62   p16c63   p16c64   p16c65
p16c71   p16c74   p16c83   p16f83   p16c84   p16f84
p16f877  p18cxx2  p18c242  p18c252  p18c442  p18c452
sx18     sx20     sx28  

If someone wants to compile a list of missing processors, I'd be glad to
add them to gpasm.

BTW, 0.8.4 has a patch from James Cameron that fixes a core dump if a
macro contains no assembly instructions.

Scott


Previous by date: 9 Jan 2000 19:13:49 -0000 Re: watch window for gpsim gui, Scott Dattalo
Next by date: 9 Jan 2000 19:13:49 -0000 Re: gpsim development, Anthony Tekatch
Previous in thread: 9 Jan 2000 19:13:49 -0000 Re: gpasm, Sam Colwell
Next in thread: 9 Jan 2000 19:13:49 -0000 Re: gpasm, Michael W. Bogucki


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.