gnupic: Re: [gnupic] cvs updates
Subject:
Re: [gnupic] cvs updates
From:
John De Villiers ####@####.####
Date:
11 Mar 2006 22:09:06 +0000
Message-Id: <1142114893.4476.38.camel@bbj.inet>
i would happily donate the cpu time for a nightly build if we can script
the whole lot.
On Sat, 2006-03-11 at 23:53, Borut Razem wrote:
> Alex Holden wrote:
>
> > On 11 Mar 2006, at 17:55, Scott Dattalo wrote:
> >
> >> SF recently announced support for SubVersion. Does anyone know if those
> >> servers are more reliable? If so, should we consider moving over? I
> >> know
> >> one benefit is that there's no 3 or 4 hour delay between the developer
> >> repository and the public repository.
> >
> >
> > I like Subversion and use it locally for all my own projects, but I
> > don't know anything about the reliability of Sourceforge's Subversion
> > servers.
> >
> I also don't know anything about the reliability of svn on SF. I'm using
> svn for my work and I'm quit satisfied with it. It has some nice
> features: the most important (at least for me) is that directories are
> also a part of the source control, so the history of deleted / renamed /
> moved file or directory is not lost (which is not the case in CVS). I
> think that the gpsim project is a good candidate for the move.
>
> I'm thinking to propose the move for the sdcc project too, but it would
> be much more complicated due to nightly snapshot builds...
>
> Borut
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
>
>
