gnupic: Looking for suggestions on adding enhanced 16F instructions to gpsim


Previous by date: 8 Jan 2011 13:04:02 -0000 Re: Looking for suggestions on adding enhanced 16F instructions to gpsim, "Néstor A. Marchesini"
Next by date: 8 Jan 2011 13:04:02 -0000 Re: Looking for suggestions on adding enhanced 16F instructions to gpsim, Joe Pfeiffer
Previous in thread: 8 Jan 2011 13:04:02 -0000 Re: Looking for suggestions on adding enhanced 16F instructions to gpsim, "Néstor A. Marchesini"
Next in thread: 8 Jan 2011 13:04:02 -0000 Re: Looking for suggestions on adding enhanced 16F instructions to gpsim, Joe Pfeiffer

Subject: Re: Looking for suggestions on adding enhanced 16F instructions to gpsim
From: Holger Oehm ####@####.####
Date: 8 Jan 2011 13:04:02 -0000
Message-Id: <201101081403.59733.holger.oehm@holger-oehm.de>

Of course it is still necessary. At least as long as the Microchip software
is not released as open source.

For "ALL platforms" is a bold statement for something that is not distributed
as source. My system for example is a LFS system: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/
I dont think that Microchip supports this platform.

On Saturday 08 January 2011, Support, Pocket MicroTechnics wrote:
> Is it really needed to work on GNU version?
> Microchip is publishing for free MPLabX that contains support for ALL chips
> and on ALL platforms with their excellent simulator and all hardware debug
> support.
> I don’t see myself need Gpasm and GxxTools anymore !!!
> 
> Regards
> 
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Byron Jeff ####@####.#### 
> Envoyé : mercredi 5 janvier 2011 17:42
> À : ####@####.####
> Objet : Looking for suggestions on adding enhanced 16F instructions to gpsim
> 
> I'm moving into working with microchip's enhanced 16F chips such as the
> 16F1939 and the 12F1822. The enhanced architecture has a double handful of
> new features:
> 
> - 32 banks
> - 14 new instructions
> - Linear address space for general purpose ram
> - Program address space addressibility from the FSR/INDF registers
> - A pair of FSR/INDF registers instead of one
> 
> It looks like a tactical backpatch of the 16F architecture with some 18F
> features.
> 
> The question is what is the most expedient way to add this set of features
> to gpsim?
> 
> Any suggestions welcome.
> 
> BAJ
> 
> --
> Byron A. Jeff
> Department Chair: IT/CS/CNET
> College of Information and Mathematical Sciences Clayton State University
> http://cims.clayton.edu/bjeff
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
> 
> 



-- 
Holger Oehm ####@####.####
KeyID: B50E51A9, 1024bit at http://www.holger-oehm.de/public-key.asc
Fingerprint: E92A 5C2C 497A 44ED 23C0  DB66 1DD9 3EF7 B50E 51A9

[Content type application/pgp-signature not shown. Download]

Previous by date: 8 Jan 2011 13:04:02 -0000 Re: Looking for suggestions on adding enhanced 16F instructions to gpsim, "Néstor A. Marchesini"
Next by date: 8 Jan 2011 13:04:02 -0000 Re: Looking for suggestions on adding enhanced 16F instructions to gpsim, Joe Pfeiffer
Previous in thread: 8 Jan 2011 13:04:02 -0000 Re: Looking for suggestions on adding enhanced 16F instructions to gpsim, "Néstor A. Marchesini"
Next in thread: 8 Jan 2011 13:04:02 -0000 Re: Looking for suggestions on adding enhanced 16F instructions to gpsim, Joe Pfeiffer


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.