gnupic: gputils 1.0.0 Release Candidate 1


Previous by date: 10 Dec 2012 04:43:29 -0000 Re: gputils 1.0.0 Release Candidate 1, Joe Pfeiffer
Next by date: 10 Dec 2012 04:43:29 -0000 Re: gputils 1.0.0 Release Candidate 1, Peter Stuge
Previous in thread: 10 Dec 2012 04:43:29 -0000 Re: gputils 1.0.0 Release Candidate 1, Joe Pfeiffer
Next in thread: 10 Dec 2012 04:43:29 -0000 Re: gputils 1.0.0 Release Candidate 1, Peter Stuge

Subject: Re: gputils 1.0.0 Release Candidate 1
From: Alain Portal ####@####.####
Date: 10 Dec 2012 04:43:29 -0000
Message-Id: <7573214.4VmkXN8JJk@cf52mk4>

Le lundi 10 décembre 2012 04:18:25 Peter Stuge a écrit :
> Alain Portal wrote:
> > > A small idea: Skip the last version number digit and go for 1.0?
> > 
> > Cleary, not!
> > I never heard a such bad idea...
> > 
> > foo-x.y.z is a rule accepted by all in the community for a very
> > long time....
> > 
> > Why do you want to break it?
> 
> x, y and z have no purpose. They are universally only for show.

No purpose????
Only for show????

Sorry, I'm french, and my english is to bad that I can really express my anger 
on about such stupid word or thought... I apparently already struggling to 
make myself understood in French when I know I'm right, then in English ...
But I'll try ...
(translated with google: ( )

If the maintainer of the software forgets to integrate the license in the 1.0 
version (1.0.0), it should create a version 1.1 to fix this? Version 1.0.1 is 
sufficient for this ...

If the maintainer of the software decides to include a new translation of man 
pages in version 1.1 (1.0.1), it should create a version 1.2 for this? Version 
1.0.2 is sufficient for this ...

If the maintainer of the software realizes he made ​​a spelling mistake (we 
reported it) in version 1.2, it should create a version 1.3 for this? Version 
1.0.3 is really enough for this ...

In x.y.z, z is the minimum for the respect of those who report a problem ...

x.y.z is a commonly accepted rule in the Linux community, why do you ignore? 
Why do you want to change this rule so simple? Why do you try to impose a new 
model?
Why?
Why?

In version 1.1 (1.1.0), I expect something other than correcting a spelling 
mistake, the translation of the manual pages Lithuanian, and adding the 
license forgotten ...

z is much more useful than believed people who come to see once a year if 
there is a new version of their favorite software, because other come see 
every day ...

I do not even hope to be understood, especially by you :(

Those who have something other than pitch chick in their head will understand, 
even if they have not appreciated my way of expressing myself ...

Translation is fully copyrighted by translate.google  :(

Please...
Go back to Windows!

With no regards!
Alain

Previous by date: 10 Dec 2012 04:43:29 -0000 Re: gputils 1.0.0 Release Candidate 1, Joe Pfeiffer
Next by date: 10 Dec 2012 04:43:29 -0000 Re: gputils 1.0.0 Release Candidate 1, Peter Stuge
Previous in thread: 10 Dec 2012 04:43:29 -0000 Re: gputils 1.0.0 Release Candidate 1, Joe Pfeiffer
Next in thread: 10 Dec 2012 04:43:29 -0000 Re: gputils 1.0.0 Release Candidate 1, Peter Stuge


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.