| Previous by date: | 7 Dec 2015 07:51:55 -0000 Re: gpasm directives vs. MPASM, Andrew E. Mileski |
| Next by date: | 7 Dec 2015 07:51:55 -0000 Re: gpasm directives vs. MPASM, Vinod Kanna R |
| Previous in thread: | 7 Dec 2015 07:51:55 -0000 Re: gpasm directives vs. MPASM, Andrew E. Mileski |
| Next in thread: | 7 Dec 2015 07:51:55 -0000 Re: gpasm directives vs. MPASM, Vinod Kanna R |
On Thu, 03 Dec 2015 18:50:18 -0500 "Andrew E. Mileski" ####@####.#### wrote: > On 2015-12-03 03:25, Molnár Károly wrote: > > On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 15:22:26 -0500 > > "Andrew E. Mileski" ####@####.#### wrote: > >> > >> I would expect IDLOCS to be treated like any other section label when > >> --mpasm-compatible is specified. > > > > The gpasm works a little differently. > > That's my point though. I'd expect it be source compatible with --mpasm-compatible > > If that's not a goal, then I'll just quietly disappear. > > > So in your case so that should be used: > > > > LIST p=16f1829 > > > > __IDLOCS H'048C' > > > > END > > > > The compiler will do this: > > > > 0x8000: 0x0C > > 0x8001: 0x08 > > 0x8002: 0x04 > > 0x8003: 0x00 > > > > That is, a single 16-bit value stored in four 4-bit part. This is a hardware limitation. > > Therefore the __IDLOCS directive can be used only once in the 12-bit and 14-bit devices. > > > > See: http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/40001440E.pdf, page 51 > > Erm... I can find no mention of a 4 bit limitation per location for this processor. > > Excerpt from DS41390D > http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/41390D.pdf > > "3.1 User ID Location > > A user may store identification information (user ID) in four designated > locations. The user ID locations are mapped to 8000h-8003h. Each location is 14 > bits in length. Code protection has no effect on these memory locations. Each > location may be read with code protection enabled or disabled." > > ~~ Andrew E. Mileski > These the new versions, please give it a try: http://sourceforge.net/projects/gputils/files/snapshot_builds/src/gputils-src-20151206-1161.tar.gz/download http://sourceforge.net/projects/gputils/files/snapshot_builds/i686-mingw32msvc/gputils-20151206-1161-setup.exe/download Károly
| Previous by date: | 7 Dec 2015 07:51:55 -0000 Re: gpasm directives vs. MPASM, Andrew E. Mileski |
| Next by date: | 7 Dec 2015 07:51:55 -0000 Re: gpasm directives vs. MPASM, Vinod Kanna R |
| Previous in thread: | 7 Dec 2015 07:51:55 -0000 Re: gpasm directives vs. MPASM, Andrew E. Mileski |
| Next in thread: | 7 Dec 2015 07:51:55 -0000 Re: gpasm directives vs. MPASM, Vinod Kanna R |