[<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
gputils in the near future
From: Borut ####@####.#### Date: 23 Oct 2012 07:19:19 -0000 Message-Id: <508644F3.6060400@gmail.com> Dear gputils users and developers, here are my plans for gputils in the near future: * make the gputils 0.14.3 release candidate 1: today o gputils 0.14.3 will support all pic devices supported by latest MPASM(X) from MPLAB v1.41 * make the gputils 0.14.3 final release if no critical regressions will be found: next weekend o this will be the last release for 0.14.x series * merge the preprocessor branch and make the 0.15.0 release: immediately after the 0.14.3 release o the preprocessor branch already includes fixes for: + defines with parameters, for example: #define sum(a, b) ((a)+(b)) + improved / multiple / nested #v() handling, for example: xxx#v(10)yyy#v(10 + #v(10)) + improved macro parameters handling: mmm macro label,instr label instr mend mmm xxx,movlw 10 * fix / implement nested WHILE handling and make the gputils 1.0.0 release: probably few weeks after the 0.15.0 release Comments are welcome. Borut | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: gputils in the near future
From: Peter Stuge ####@####.#### Date: 23 Oct 2012 08:15:42 -0000 Message-Id: <20121023081537.8390.qmail@stuge.se> Borut Ražem wrote: > * make the gputils 0.14.3 release candidate 1: today > o gputils 0.14.3 will support all pic devices supported by latest > MPASM(X) from MPLAB v1.41 I guess that includes the bunch of PICs that were just announced? PIC16F1454 PIC16F1455 PIC16F1459 PIC18F13K50 PIC18F14K50 PIC18F24K50 PIC18F25K50 PIC18F45K50 PIC18F65J94 PIC18F66J94 PIC18F67J94 PIC18F85J94 PIC18F86J94 PIC18F87J94 PIC18F95J94 PIC18F96J94 PIC18F97J94 > Comments are welcome. Looks really great, regardless of status of above parts! //Peter | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: gputils in the near future
From: Borut ####@####.#### Date: 23 Oct 2012 08:24:02 -0000 Message-Id: <CADXbRGj2qVnBL+_dSutpkMb++=wDtE_RA3AtHcL1MffKNsa6xQ@mail.gmail.com> Yes, the listed pics are included. Borut On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Peter Stuge ####@####.#### wrote: > Borut Ražem wrote: > > * make the gputils 0.14.3 release candidate 1: today > > o gputils 0.14.3 will support all pic devices supported by latest > > MPASM(X) from MPLAB v1.41 > > I guess that includes the bunch of PICs that were just announced? > > PIC16F1454 > PIC16F1455 > PIC16F1459 > PIC18F13K50 > PIC18F14K50 > PIC18F24K50 > PIC18F25K50 > PIC18F45K50 > PIC18F65J94 > PIC18F66J94 > PIC18F67J94 > PIC18F85J94 > PIC18F86J94 > PIC18F87J94 > PIC18F95J94 > PIC18F96J94 > PIC18F97J94 > > > > Comments are welcome. > > Looks really great, regardless of status of above parts! > > > //Peter > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.#### > For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.#### > > | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: gputils in the near future
From: Byron Jeff ####@####.#### Date: 23 Oct 2012 11:26:05 -0000 Message-Id: <20121023112554.GA9937@mail.clayton.edu> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 09:19:15AM +0200, Borut Ražem wrote: > Dear gputils users and developers, > > here are my plans for gputils in the near future: > > * make the gputils 0.14.3 release candidate 1: today > o gputils 0.14.3 will support all pic devices supported by latest > MPASM(X) from MPLAB v1.41 Does this include simulation of all devices too? While assembly and linking have kept up well, I've been waiting for gpsim to catch up with the others. > * make the gputils 0.14.3 final release if no critical regressions > will be found: next weekend > o this will be the last release for 0.14.x series > * merge the preprocessor branch and make the 0.15.0 release: > immediately after the 0.14.3 release > o the preprocessor branch already includes fixes for: > + defines with parameters, for example: > > #define sum(a, b) ((a)+(b)) > > + improved / multiple / nested #v() handling, for example: > > xxx#v(10)yyy#v(10 + #v(10)) > > + improved macro parameters handling: > > mmm macro label,instr > label instr > mend > mmm xxx,movlw 10 All excellent additions. BAJ > > * fix / implement nested WHILE handling and make the gputils 1.0.0 > release: probably few weeks after the 0.15.0 release > > Comments are welcome. > > Borut > -- Byron A. Jeff Chair: Department of Computer Science and Information Technology College of Information and Mathematical Sciences Clayton State University http://faculty.clayton.edu/bjeff | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: gputils in the near future
From: Byron Jeff ####@####.#### Date: 23 Oct 2012 11:37:51 -0000 Message-Id: <20121023113738.GA10101@mail.clayton.edu> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 07:25:54AM -0400, Byron Jeff wrote: > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 09:19:15AM +0200, Borut Ražem wrote: > > Dear gputils users and developers, > > > > here are my plans for gputils in the near future: > > > > * make the gputils 0.14.3 release candidate 1: today > > o gputils 0.14.3 will support all pic devices supported by latest > > MPASM(X) from MPLAB v1.41 > > Does this include simulation of all devices too? While assembly and linking > have kept up well, I've been waiting for gpsim to catch up with the others. My mistake. I realize now that gpsim is a separate package. BAJ -- Byron A. Jeff Chair: Department of Computer Science and Information Technology College of Information and Mathematical Sciences Clayton State University http://faculty.clayton.edu/bjeff | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: gputils in the near future
From: john de villiers ####@####.#### Date: 23 Oct 2012 13:58:19 -0000 Message-Id: <5086A26E.8010808@plz.co.za> On 23/10/2012 09:19, Borut Ražem wrote: > Dear gputils users and developers, > > here are my plans for gputils in the near future: > > * make the gputils 0.14.3 release candidate 1: today > o gputils 0.14.3 will support all pic devices supported by latest > MPASM(X) from MPLAB v1.41 > * make the gputils 0.14.3 final release if no critical regressions > will be found: next weekend > o this will be the last release for 0.14.x series > * merge the preprocessor branch and make the 0.15.0 release: > immediately after the 0.14.3 release > o the preprocessor branch already includes fixes for: > + defines with parameters, for example: > > #define sum(a, b) ((a)+(b)) > > + improved / multiple / nested #v() handling, for example: > > xxx#v(10)yyy#v(10 + #v(10)) > > + improved macro parameters handling: > > mmm macro label,instr > label instr > mend > mmm xxx,movlw 10 > > * fix / implement nested WHILE handling and make the gputils 1.0.0 > release: probably few weeks after the 0.15.0 release > > Comments are welcome. > > Borut > how about intergrating gp utils into the arduino ide( seeing as it > too is open source? regards john | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: gputils in the near future
From: Peter Stuge ####@####.#### Date: 25 Oct 2012 04:15:17 -0000 Message-Id: <20121025041417.25190.qmail@stuge.se> john de villiers wrote: > how about intergrating gp utils into the arduino ide( seeing as it > too is open source? For me that would be the antithesis of what gputils is about. But if you would like to see it, I encourage you to do it yourself! //Peter | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: gputils in the near future
From: Borut ####@####.#### Date: 31 Dec 2012 08:22:13 -0000 Message-Id: <50E14B32.1010506@gmail.com> Mission completed ;-) I wish you all the best in 2013, Borut On 23. 10. 2012 09:19, Borut Ražem wrote: > Dear gputils users and developers, > > here are my plans for gputils in the near future: > > * make the gputils 0.14.3 release candidate 1: today > o gputils 0.14.3 will support all pic devices supported by > latest MPASM(X) from MPLAB v1.41 > * make the gputils 0.14.3 final release if no critical regressions > will be found: next weekend > o this will be the last release for 0.14.x series > * merge the preprocessor branch and make the 0.15.0 release: > immediately after the 0.14.3 release > o the preprocessor branch already includes fixes for: > + defines with parameters, for example: > #define sum(a, b) ((a)+(b)) > + improved / multiple / nested #v() handling, for example: > xxx#v(10)yyy#v(10 + #v(10)) > + improved macro parameters handling: > mmm macro label,instr > label instr > mend > mmm xxx,movlw 10 > * fix / implement nested WHILE handling and make the gputils 1.0.0 > release: probably few weeks after the 0.15.0 release > > Comments are welcome. > > Borut > | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: gputils in the near future
From: Joe Pfeiffer ####@####.#### Date: 31 Dec 2012 17:15:35 -0000 Message-Id: <20705.51250.662339.923167@snowball.wb.pfeifferfamily.net> Thank you very much for your hard work on this -- and Happy New Year! Borut Ražem writes: >Mission completed ;-) > >I wish you all the best in 2013, >Borut > >On 23. 10. 2012 09:19, Borut Ražem wrote: >> Dear gputils users and developers, >> >> here are my plans for gputils in the near future: >> >> * make the gputils 0.14.3 release candidate 1: today >> o gputils 0.14.3 will support all pic devices supported by >> latest MPASM(X) from MPLAB v1.41 >> * make the gputils 0.14.3 final release if no critical regressions >> will be found: next weekend >> o this will be the last release for 0.14.x series >> * merge the preprocessor branch and make the 0.15.0 release: >> immediately after the 0.14.3 release >> o the preprocessor branch already includes fixes for: >> + defines with parameters, for example: >> #define sum(a, b) ((a)+(b)) >> + improved / multiple / nested #v() handling, for example: >> xxx#v(10)yyy#v(10 + #v(10)) >> + improved macro parameters handling: >> mmm macro label,instr >> label instr >> mend >> mmm xxx,movlw 10 >> * fix / implement nested WHILE handling and make the gputils 1.0.0 >> release: probably few weeks after the 0.15.0 release >> >> Comments are welcome. >> >> Borut >> > -- Joseph J. Pfeiffer, Jr., Ph.D. http://pfeifferfamily.net/ 1440 Tierra del Sol Dr 575.525.2764 (H) Las Cruces, NM 88007 575.496.3501 (C) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>] |