nanogui: Re: [linuxce-devel] Re: Web browser ported to Microwindows


Previous by date: 19 Nov 1999 08:45:11 -0000 Re: [linuxce-devel] Re: Web browser ported to Microwindows, Richard Kvalsvik
Next by date: 19 Nov 1999 08:45:11 -0000 Re: [linuxce-devel] Re: Web browser ported to Microwindows, Alan Cox
Previous in thread: 19 Nov 1999 08:45:11 -0000 Re: [linuxce-devel] Re: Web browser ported to Microwindows, Richard Kvalsvik
Next in thread: 19 Nov 1999 08:45:11 -0000 Re: [linuxce-devel] Re: Web browser ported to Microwindows, Alan Cox

Subject: RE: [linuxce-devel] Re: Web browser ported to Microwindows
From: "John Clark L. Naldoza" ####@####.####
Date: 19 Nov 1999 08:45:11 -0000
Message-Id: <01f201bf3268$224380a0$4665280a@abkntesntbp70.ntes.nec.co.jp>

Heya,

>
>
>I have heard a lot of things about konqueror, and much of it is not really
>good.
>I really cant tell, I haven't seen anything of it. Is it as good as the
>developers
>say it is ?
>


Can't really say because I have done any "standard" (if there is one) test.
But I had a chance to try out the KDE system with (what I assumed to be) the
KDE browser and  it "appeared" faster.  And the display was much better, in
my opinion, than that of Netscape.

But then again I haven't tried it out that much...  Too damn busy
programming these friggin' routers...;-)


Stay Cool,


J.C.


Previous by date: 19 Nov 1999 08:45:11 -0000 Re: [linuxce-devel] Re: Web browser ported to Microwindows, Richard Kvalsvik
Next by date: 19 Nov 1999 08:45:11 -0000 Re: [linuxce-devel] Re: Web browser ported to Microwindows, Alan Cox
Previous in thread: 19 Nov 1999 08:45:11 -0000 Re: [linuxce-devel] Re: Web browser ported to Microwindows, Richard Kvalsvik
Next in thread: 19 Nov 1999 08:45:11 -0000 Re: [linuxce-devel] Re: Web browser ported to Microwindows, Alan Cox


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.