nanogui: window manager support in nano-X


Previous by date: 23 Nov 1999 02:33:51 -0000 Re: window manager support in nano-X, Greg Haerr
Next by date: 23 Nov 1999 02:33:51 -0000 Re: window manager support in nano-X, Michael ROGERS
Previous in thread: 23 Nov 1999 02:33:51 -0000 Re: window manager support in nano-X, Greg Haerr
Next in thread: 23 Nov 1999 02:33:51 -0000 Re: window manager support in nano-X, Michael ROGERS

Subject: Re: window manager support in nano-X
From: Daniel R Risacher ####@####.####
Date: 23 Nov 1999 02:33:51 -0000
Message-Id: <m2bt8mdju6.fsf@alum.mit.edu>

>>>>> "Greg" == Greg Haerr ####@####.#### writes:

    Greg> Dan, Actually, as I start to think about this, it also might
    Greg> be a good idea to think about having a very simple API that
    Greg> would allow the server draw code to be "resent" to another
    Greg> set of procedures.  In this way, we wouldn't require that
    Greg> the window manager be another process.  Microwindows
    Greg> currently runs on single-tasking systems and it might be
    Greg> nice to not require a separate process to handle mere window
    Greg> dressings.

Well, I see Microwindows as being the right solution for very small
processors (single tasking), and nano-X as being the right solution
for slightly more capable systems.  X11R6 is the right solution for
desktop systems, and WinNT is the right solution for boat anchors.
(grin)

I'm not sure what you're envisioning in the paragraph above.  Care to
elaborate?

-- 
                       What color is green?

Daniel Risacher                                   ####@####.####

Previous by date: 23 Nov 1999 02:33:51 -0000 Re: window manager support in nano-X, Greg Haerr
Next by date: 23 Nov 1999 02:33:51 -0000 Re: window manager support in nano-X, Michael ROGERS
Previous in thread: 23 Nov 1999 02:33:51 -0000 Re: window manager support in nano-X, Greg Haerr
Next in thread: 23 Nov 1999 02:33:51 -0000 Re: window manager support in nano-X, Michael ROGERS


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.